Toxicity Toolkit 7 – Week 3 – Untrue Narratives

Week Three

Untrue and Incomplete Narratives

Week Three: Disrupting the Narrative 

Audio Version

One type of gaslighting is having to participate in untrue or incomplete narratives as though they are your own true narrative. These untrue or incomplete narratives frequently serve to maintain the control in a relationship.

These warped narratives often position the Narrator as the hero, victim, or martyr of their story, and will position others as villains.  

This week we will work to identify this type of gaslighting. 

Untrue or incomplete narratives may make the recipient feel as though they can only receive and reflect an opinion, but that sharing their own perspective is not welcome in the space, or would be punished.

This feeling is a red flag that something is amiss.  

If you suspect this may be taking place, ask yourself “Is this narrative true to the best of my knowledge?” and “is part of the story being ignored to provide this narrative?” 

If the answer is “yes,” you recognize that the narrative is untrue or incomplete, and that you do not have to participate.  

When you recognize that this type of gaslighting is taking place say “This is gaslighting. I do not have to participate in untrue or incomplete narratives to appease others.” 

Provide information to make the narrative true/complete to the best of your knowledge. Explain how the narrative is different with the new information.

Question the motives and benefits of the untrue/incomplete narrative to begin with. Does the narrative position the Narrator as the hero, victim, or martyr? Would that change if the true story is told? Who is positioned as the Villain?  

If the Narrator is approachable, share this with them when it happens. If not, there is a lot of power in revealing these behaviors to yourself.

What do you do in the situation?

Do you agree with the Narrator? Do you shut down? Do you become explosive? Do you have enough agency to interrupt the behavior? Are you reinforcing it? 

Whether you address the event with the Narrator or analyze it for yourself, you will be rebuilding your authentic self, giving yourself back your own truths.

Keep a journal of instances that occur in the week.  

Practice also helps. You may not feel comfortable jumping in and redirecting the narrative to start with, so watch for examples of when untrue or incomplete narratives are invoked.

Watch for it in TV shows. Pay attention to interactions at work.

Identify when it’s happening, who benefits, who is being controlled, and explore alternatives.

You may also find it useful to roleplay with someone who knows you’re working through this toxicity.

Remember also that this toolkit is meant to build skills in everyday relationships. If the Narrator is very resistant to true/complete narratives, this may indicate a more severe level of abuse or control than you originally thought. Please find a therapist to help you navigate the situation if this is the case.

The Narrator may not realize that they are warping narratives. They may believe that their version is the true and complete version.

They have likely been using this tactic to control those around them for so long that they have normalized the behavior. Giving them examples of when it happens may help get them on board for changing the behavior.

If you don’t feel like the Narrator is receptive in the moment, write it down and present it to them later, when things aren’t so charged. Give time and space for them to digest the information before having to engage with you over it.

Prepare Yourself

Example

Let’s say I’m riding in a car driven by someone else and a lane is closing ahead. The driver becomes angry that cars are “waiting until the last moment” to merge, and therefore the driver insists on stopping them from merging out of spite. The driver is ranting and acting aggitated.

I will recognize the narrative as untrue and incomplete.

I will say “This is gaslighting. I do not have to participate in untrue or incomplete narratives to appease others. Your interpretation leaves out the information that the zipper method requires that cars take turns at the point of closure, and by alternating the lanes moving forward allows for seamless reduction of traffic. The other drivers are using the recommended method by the Colorado Department of Transportation, and you’re mad at them for it. It works, seamlessly, unless someone decides not to let in people from the other lane. That person is you. Leaving that information out enables you to be mad at everyone on the road, but it’s untrue and unfair, and I do not have to participate in it.”

I will continue by questioning “Why do you need this narrative, and why do you expect me to participate in it?”

Additionally, I may point out that:

~ Each other driver is meeting the demands of their own lives from their own perspectives, and

~Their decision to merge isn’t a premeditated action against the driver.

~ That being gracious and kind and understanding would cost the driver nothing and would reduce the stress of the drive.

I may ask “Why is this approach not an option too?” 

I will question to myself how the driver is benefitting from being a victim/hero/martyr.


Let me provide another example (from my journal)

References: 

Gaslighting: GoodTherapy

Regaining Control of the Narrative: Psychology Today

Gaslighting and a Narcissist’s Need to Control the Narrative

Video Version

Week Three



What do you think?