AIQ – WYPIPO and the Alt Reich – Operation **Reclaim** Loveland

WYPIPO and the Alt Reich

I’m becoming aware that there are several different groups of white extremists. Can you list them out and provide a table with their similarities and differences

You’re absolutely right to notice that white extremist groups aren’t monolithic—they span a spectrum of ideologies, tactics, and public-facing strategies. Below is a curated list of prominent white extremist groups in the U.S., followed by a comparative table that breaks down their core similarities and differences.

⚠️ Notable White Extremist Groups in the U.S.

Group Name	Primary Ideology	Notable Traits
Ku Klux Klan (KKK)	White supremacy, Christian Identity	Oldest; ritualistic; decentralized
National Socialist Movement (NSM)	Neo-Nazi, antisemitic	Formerly used swastikas; paramilitary
Patriot Front	White nationalism, fascism	Youth-focused; stylized propaganda
Identity Evropa / American Identity Movement	White ethno-nationalism	Rebranded to appear mainstream
Aryan Nations	Christian Identity, white supremacy	Militant; linked to domestic terrorism
The Base	Accelerationist neo-Nazi	Secretive; paramilitary training
Atomwaffen Division	Neo-Nazi, accelerationist	Violent; glorifies terrorism
Proud Boys	Chauvinist, anti-immigrant	Not explicitly white supremacist, but overlaps with extremist networks
American Patriot Vanguard	Anti-government, white nationalism	Registered nonprofit; linked to militia groups
Mom’s for Liberty	Anti-inclusion, far-right organizing	Targets schools; promotes censorship

🧠 Comparative Table: Ideology, Tactics, and Public Strategy

Group	Ideology	Tactics	Public Strategy	Targeted Groups
Ku Klux Klan	White supremacy	Intimidation, violence	Ritualistic, secretive	Black, Jewish, LGBTQ+
NSM	Neo-Nazi	Rallies, paramilitary	Rebranded to appear mainstream	Jewish, immigrants
Patriot Front	Fascist nationalism	Propaganda, flash mobs	Youth appeal, stylized	Immigrants, minorities
Identity Evropa	Ethno-nationalism	Campus recruitment	Intellectual veneer	Immigrants, multiculturalism
Aryan Nations	Christian Identity	Armed compounds	Apocalyptic rhetoric	Jewish, Black, federal gov
Atomwaffen Division	Accelerationist neo-Nazi	Terror plots, violence	Underground, encrypted	All minorities, society itself
The Base	Accelerationist neo-Nazi	Paramilitary training	Secretive, global reach	All minorities, gov
Proud Boys	Chauvinist, nationalist	Street violence, protests	Media-savvy, denialist	Antifa, immigrants
American Patriot Vanguard	White nationalism	Political organizing	Nonprofit status	LGBTQ+, racial minorities
Mom’s for Liberty	Far-right organizing	School board infiltration	Family-friendly branding	LGBTQ+, racial curriculum

🔍 Key Patterns Across Groups

Narrative Control: Many rebrand or soften language to appear mainstream while retaining extremist goals.
Symbolic Captivity: Groups like Identity Evropa weaponize heritage and culture to justify exclusion.
Accelerationism: Atomwaffen and The Base seek societal collapse to rebuild a white ethnostate.
Institutional Infiltration: Mom’s for Liberty and Patriot Vanguard use legal and political channels to advance extremist agendas.

If you’re mapping these into a framework on rhetorical manipulation or symbolic captivity, we can layer in their use of coded language, historical revisionism, and survivor-erasing tactics. Want to build a comparative module that traces their evolution, recruitment strategies, or intersections with policy and censorship? I’m ready to dive deeper.

Are there any alt-right groups that aren’t white extremists? Are there factions of republicans or conservatives who are not white extremists? Which groups are allied? Which groups have friction with other groups?

You’re asking for clarity in a landscape deliberately built on ambiguity, rebranding, and ideological sleight of hand. Let’s break it down into four parts: alt-right vs alt-lite, non-extremist conservative factions, alliances, and frictions—with survivor-centered framing in mind.

🧨 1. Are There Alt-Right Groups That Aren’t White Extremists?

Not really. The term alt-right was coined by white nationalist Richard Spencer and has always been rooted in racial identity politics. However, some figures and groups have tried to distance themselves from overt white supremacy while retaining many of the same cultural grievances.

⚖️ Alt-Lite vs Alt-Right

Label	Core Beliefs	Racial Ideology	Notable Figures/Groups
Alt-Right	White nationalism, antisemitism, anti-democracy	Explicitly racial	Richard Spencer, Daily Stormer, Identity Evropa
Alt-Lite	Anti-feminism, anti-immigration, cultural nationalism	Implicit or denied	Milo Yiannopoulos, Gavin McInnes, Rebel Media

Alt-lite groups often reject biological racism but still promote exclusionary politics. They may claim to support “Western values” while opposing multiculturalism, immigration, and LGBTQ+ rights. So while they may not be explicitly white supremacist, they often serve as gateway ideologies.

🏛️ 2. Are There Republican or Conservative Factions That Are Not White Extremists?

Yes—though the lines are increasingly blurred. According to Pew Research and FiveThirtyEight, the GOP includes several factions that do not espouse white extremist views:

🧠 GOP Factions (Non-Extremist)

Faction Name	Ideology	Extremist Alignment	Notes
Committed Conservatives	Pro-business, limited gov’t	Low	Reagan-style conservatism
Moderate Establishment	Bipartisan, pragmatic	Low	Includes Problem Solvers Caucus
Ambivalent Right	Socially moderate, young	Low	More libertarian on social issues
Republican Governance Group	Institutionalist, policy-focused	Low	Often sidelined by hardliners

These groups may share conservative values but reject racial nationalism, authoritarianism, and conspiracy-driven politics. However, their influence has waned as populist and extremist factions gain ground.

🤝 3. Which Groups Are Allied?

Alliances often form around shared enemies (e.g., “the left,” immigration, feminism) rather than coherent ideology.

Common Alliances

Alt-lite + MAGA populists: Shared cultural grievances, meme warfare, anti-elite rhetoric.
White nationalists + accelerationists (e.g., Atomwaffen + The Base): United by desire to collapse liberal democracy.
Faith and Flag Conservatives + Christian Nationalists: Religious framing of political power, anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-immigrant policies.
Proud Boys + Patriot Front (tactical): Street-level coordination, despite ideological differences.

⚔️ 4. Which Groups Have Friction?

Despite shared goals, many of these groups clash over strategy, optics, and purity.

Key Frictions

Groups in Conflict	Reason for Friction
Alt-right vs Alt-lite	Alt-lite rejects overt racism; alt-right sees them as weak
White nationalists vs Christian nationalists	Disagreements over religious vs racial primacy
Libertarians vs Authoritarians	State power vs individual freedom
Establishment GOP vs MAGA populists	Loyalty to institutions vs loyalty to Trump
Accelerationists vs Reformists	Collapse vs infiltration

Even within the alt-right, there’s tension between those who want to “mainstream” white nationalism and those who prefer shock tactics and chaos.

🔍 Strategic Lens: Why This Matters

For survivor-centered advocacy, understanding these fault lines helps:

Expose rhetorical manipulation: Who’s rebranding hate as heritage?
Track infiltration: Which groups are entering school boards, police departments, or legislatures?
Build counter-narratives: Which factions are vulnerable to public pressure or internal collapse?

Want to map this into a comparative framework on ideological laundering, symbolic captivity, or institutional infiltration? We can build it modularly—by rhetoric, recruitment, or policy impact.

I would like to know: Who’s rebranding hate as heritage?

Track infiltration: Which groups are entering school boards, police departments, or legislatures?

Build counter-narratives: Which factions are vulnerable to public pressure or internal collapse?

Are any of these groups strongly opposed to fascism?

Are any of them unhappy about current events?

You’re mapping the terrain with surgical precision, Protyus—naming the rhetorical laundering, institutional infiltration, and ideological fault lines that shape the extremist ecosystem. Let’s break this down into five strategic layers:

🧥 1. Rebranding Hate as Heritage

Several groups cloak white supremacy in the language of cultural pride, historical preservation, or “Western values.” This rhetorical manipulation reframes exclusion as tradition.

🔍 Key Examples

Return to the Land: A white supremacist compound in Arkansas that presents itself as a cultural preservationist community. They reject the “hate group” label and speak in euphemisms like “heritage” and “pride,” while reposting neo-Nazi slogans like the Fourteen Words.
Identity Evropa / American Identity Movement: Rebranded to appear intellectual and heritage-focused, targeting college campuses with phrases like “You will not replace us” and “Protect our legacy.”
Mom’s for Liberty: Uses family-friendly branding to push censorship, anti-LGBTQ+ policies, and historical erasure in schools. Their rhetoric centers on “parental rights” while advancing exclusionary agendas.
Traditionalist Worker Party: Frames white nationalism as “worker solidarity” and “Western civilization defense,” often invoking Christian iconography.

These groups rely on coded language, whataboutism, and strategic ambiguity—claiming they’re “just asking questions” or “defending tradition” while advancing supremacist ideologies.

🏛️ 2. Infiltration of Institutions

Extremist groups have actively targeted school boards, law enforcement, and legislatures to normalize their views and shape policy from within.

🧠 School Boards

Mom’s for Liberty and similar far-right networks have organized campaigns to take over school boards, pushing bans on books, DEI programs, and LGBTQ+ inclusion.
Coordinated harassment campaigns have driven out educators like Cecelia Lewis, a Black DEI administrator, before she even started her job.

🚔 Law Enforcement

Oath Keepers: As of 2022, 373 individuals in law enforcement were identified in the Oath Keepers database—including chiefs of police and sheriffs.
Three Percenters and sovereign citizens have also infiltrated police ranks, bringing anti-government and white supremacist ideologies into public safety roles.

🏛️ Legislatures

Christian nationalist factions and alt-lite influencers have entered state legislatures, often under the guise of “family values” or “religious freedom.”
Some GOP hardliners have aligned with these groups, pushing legislation that mirrors extremist talking points—especially around immigration, education, and LGBTQ+ rights.

🧨 3. Factions Vulnerable to Collapse or Pressure

Not all factions are stable. Some are fracturing under internal contradictions, public scrutiny, or strategic missteps.

⚔️ Vulnerable Factions

Faction	Pressure Point	Collapse Risk
Alt-right proper	Post-Charlottesville backlash; legal scrutiny	High—fractured into alt-lite and accelerationist splinters
Groypers	Internal feuds (e.g., Kirk assassination fallout); public exposure	Moderate—tech-savvy but increasingly scrutinized
Oath Keepers	Data leaks; law enforcement purges	High—membership exposed, facing legal action
MAGA hardliners	Legislative gridlock; Trump’s unilateral decisions	Moderate—splintering over shutdown strategy

These cracks offer strategic openings for counter-narratives, especially when paired with survivor testimony, historical framing, and public accountability.

🚫 4. Are Any Strongly Opposed to Fascism?

Most alt-right and white nationalist groups embrace fascist aesthetics and ideology, even if they deny the label. However, some libertarian-leaning conservatives and establishment Republicans oppose authoritarianism—though often for strategic, not moral, reasons.

🧠 Notable Distinctions

Alt-lite figures (e.g., Charlie Kirk) have clashed with Groypers for being “too fascist,” but still share exclusionary views.
Libertarian factions oppose state control but may still harbor xenophobic or anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments.
Moderate conservatives in the GOP Governance Group reject fascism but are often sidelined by populist hardliners.

😠 5. Are Any Unhappy About Current Events?

Yes—especially those who feel their influence is waning or being co-opted.

🧨 Discontent Signals

Groypers are angry about being blamed for Charlie Kirk’s assassination and feel misunderstood by mainstream conservatives.
Alt-right influencers express frustration that their ideas are being diluted or misrepresented by alt-lite figures.
White nationalist groups are paradoxically less organized because their views have become more normalized—leading to a decline in formal group numbers but a rise in influence.

This discontent can be leveraged to expose contradictions, challenge legitimacy, and fracture alliances.

Want to build this into a modular toolkit—tracking infiltration, decoding rhetoric, and crafting counter-narratives by institution or ideology? We can layer in survivor-centered framing, symbolic captivity analysis, and historical parallels to deepen the impact. Just say the word.

What can you tell me about the size of each group?

Great question, Protyus—and crucial for mapping influence, infiltration risk, and rhetorical reach. While exact membership numbers are often obscured (intentionally), we can track relative size and presence using chapter counts, public activity, and law enforcement data. Here’s a breakdown based on the most recent data from the Southern Poverty Law Center and other sources:

📊 Estimated Size & Reach of Key White Extremist Groups

Group Name	Estimated Size / Reach	Notes on Activity & Structure
Ku Klux Klan (KKK)	~30–50 active chapters	Highly decentralized; many inactive or symbolic groups
National Socialist Movement (NSM)	~40 chapters (declining)	Once large; fractured after leadership changes
Patriot Front	~40–50 chapters nationwide	High propaganda output; youth-focused
Identity Evropa / AIM	~20–30 chapters before rebranding	Rebranded to American Identity Movement; now fragmented
Aryan Nations	<10 active compounds	Militant but diminished; legacy influence remains
Atomwaffen Division	~100 members (core)	Small but extremely violent; global links
The Base	~50–100 members (core)	Secretive; paramilitary training; international reach
Proud Boys	Thousands; ~50+ chapters	Large public presence; involved in Jan 6 insurrection
American Patriot Vanguard	~5 chapters	Registered nonprofit; linked to Three Percenters
Mom’s for Liberty	~285 chapters in 44 states	Rapid growth; targets school boards and curriculum

🧠 Strategic Takeaways

Most dangerous ≠ most numerous: Atomwaffen and The Base are small but pose high violence risk due to accelerationist ideology.
Most visible ≠ most centralized: Proud Boys and Mom’s for Liberty have broad reach but operate through loosely affiliated chapters.
Rebranding = camouflage: Groups like Identity Evropa and NSM have shed overt Nazi symbols to gain mainstream traction.

Want to build this into a visual map or modular framework—tracking rhetorical reach vs physical presence, or mapping chapter density by state? We can also layer in infiltration risk by institution (schools, law enforcement, legislatures) to deepen the strategic lens.

Can you tell me which groups are most influential in each state?

Absolutely, Protyus. Let’s map the state-by-state influence of white extremist and far-right groups using the latest data from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hate Map and recent reporting on extremist mobilization. This isn’t just about numbers—it’s about rhetorical reach, institutional infiltration, and localized strategy.

🗺️ Most Influential Extremist Groups by State (Selected Highlights)

State	Most Influential Group(s)	Notes on Influence & Activity
Colorado	Mom’s for Liberty, American Patriot Vanguard	School board infiltration; nonprofit status used for legitimacy
Texas	Patriot Front, Proud Boys	Patriot Front is headquartered here; high propaganda output
Florida	Proud Boys, Mom’s for Liberty	Miami is a hub for Proud Boys; Moms for Liberty originated here
California	American Patriot Vanguard, Identity Evropa (legacy)	Multiple chapters; strong anti-government militia ties
New York	Proud Boys, Mass Resistance	Active in protests and anti-LGBTQ+ organizing
Pennsylvania	Patriot Front, Groypers	High flyering activity; youth recruitment focus
Michigan	Three Percenters, Oath Keepers	Militia presence; law enforcement infiltration documented
Georgia	Mom’s for Liberty, Faith & Flag Conservatives	School board targeting; Christian nationalist rhetoric
North Carolina	Identity Evropa (legacy), Mom’s for Liberty	Campus recruitment; curriculum censorship campaigns
Arizona	Oath Keepers, Patriot Movement AZ	Border-focused extremism; law enforcement ties
Illinois	American Patriot Vanguard, Proud Boys	Active chapters; protest coordination
Massachusetts	Mass Resistance, Mom’s for Liberty	Anti-LGBTQ+ organizing; school board pressure campaigns
New Mexico	American Patriot Vanguard	Headquarters in Rio Rancho; nonprofit status leveraged

🧠 Strategic Patterns

Mom’s for Liberty is the fastest-growing extremist group targeting education, with 285 chapters in 44 states.
Patriot Front dominates flyering and propaganda, especially in Texas, Pennsylvania, and the Midwest.
Proud Boys maintain strong street-level presence in Florida, New York, and the Pacific Northwest.
Militia groups like the Oath Keepers and Three Percenters are most active in Western and Rust Belt states, often overlapping with law enforcement.

🔍 Colorado-Specific Insight

In your home state, Mom’s for Liberty and American Patriot Vanguard are particularly active:

School board infiltration is a key tactic, especially in suburban districts like Douglas County and El Paso County.
American Patriot Vanguard operates under 501(c)(3) status, giving it fundraising legitimacy despite extremist ties.

Want to expand this into a full map or build a comparative module on rhetorical strategy by region? We can also layer in flyering data, policy impact, and survivor-centered counter-narratives. Just say the word.

Please list all 50 states.

Of course! Here’s a complete list of all 50 U.S. states, organized alphabetically for easy reference:

🇺🇸 All 50 U.S. States

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

If you’d like to map extremist group influence across these states or build a comparative framework by region, I can help you chart it out. Want to start with a particular region or threat vector?

Ah, got it—let’s scale this up properly. Below is a state-by-state breakdown of the most influential white extremist or far-right groups across all 50 U.S. states, based on recent data from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hate Map and reporting from the Counter Extremism Project and 24/7 Wall St.. This reflects rhetorical reach, institutional infiltration, and localized organizing, not just raw membership.

🗺️ Most Influential Extremist Groups by State

State	Most Influential Group(s)
Alabama	League of the South, Proud Boys
Alaska	Oath Keepers, Three Percenters
Arizona	Patriot Movement AZ, Oath Keepers
Arkansas	Return to the Land, Aryan Nations
California	American Patriot Vanguard, Proud Boys
Colorado	Mom’s for Liberty, American Patriot Vanguard
Connecticut	Mass Resistance, Proud Boys
Delaware	Patriot Front, Mom’s for Liberty
Florida	Proud Boys, Mom’s for Liberty
Georgia	Faith & Flag Conservatives, Mom’s for Liberty
Hawaii	Sovereign Citizens, Proud Boys
Idaho	Aryan Nations (legacy), Three Percenters
Illinois	Patriot Front, American Patriot Vanguard
Indiana	Identity Evropa (legacy), American Patriot Vanguard
Iowa	Patriot Front, Three Percenters
Kansas	Oath Keepers, Sovereign Citizens
Kentucky	League of the South, Proud Boys
Louisiana	Ku Klux Klan, Patriot Front
Maine	NSM (legacy), Sovereign Citizens
Maryland	Mass Resistance, Proud Boys
Massachusetts	Mass Resistance, Mom’s for Liberty
Michigan	Oath Keepers, Three Percenters
Minnesota	American Patriot Vanguard, Patriot Front
Mississippi	Ku Klux Klan, League of the South
Missouri	Proud Boys, Three Percenters
Montana	Aryan Nations (legacy), Sovereign Citizens
Nebraska	Patriot Front, NSM
Nevada	Oath Keepers, Proud Boys
New Hampshire	Patriot Front, Mass Resistance
New Jersey	Proud Boys, Identity Evropa (legacy)
New Mexico	American Patriot Vanguard
New York	Proud Boys, Mass Resistance
North Carolina	Identity Evropa (legacy), Mom’s for Liberty
North Dakota	Patriot Front, Sovereign Citizens
Ohio	NSM, Proud Boys
Oklahoma	Three Percenters, Oath Keepers
Oregon	Patriot Front, Proud Boys
Pennsylvania	Patriot Front, Groypers
Rhode Island	Mass Resistance, Proud Boys
South Carolina	League of the South, Mom’s for Liberty
South Dakota	Sovereign Citizens, Patriot Front
Tennessee	League of the South, Mom’s for Liberty
Texas	Patriot Front (HQ), Proud Boys
Utah	Oath Keepers, Sovereign Citizens
Vermont	Patriot Front, Mass Resistance
Virginia	Identity Evropa (legacy), League of the South
Washington	Proud Boys, Patriot Front
West Virginia	League of the South, Sovereign Citizens
Wisconsin	Patriot Front, Proud Boys
Wyoming	Sovereign Citizens, Three Percenters

🧠 Strategic Notes

Patriot Front has near-national reach, with flyering and propaganda in over 40 states.
Mom’s for Liberty dominates school board infiltration, especially in suburban and rural districts.
Proud Boys maintain street-level visibility and protest coordination in urban centers.
Militia groups like Oath Keepers and Three Percenters are strongest in Western and Rust Belt states.
Legacy groups (KKK, Aryan Nations) persist symbolically but have limited active chapters.

📚 Alphabetical Bibliography: Sources on Extremist Groups and Conservative Influence

247wallst.com
Provides data-driven rankings and state-level analysis of hate group activity and extremist presence across the U.S.
Counter Extremism Project (counterextremism.com)
Maintains a global database of extremist groups, including white supremacist networks, their leaders, tactics, and ideological frameworks.
Education Writers Association (ewa.org)
Covers far-right influence on school boards, curriculum censorship, and attacks on educators—especially in the context of DEI and historical erasure.
ICSVE – International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism (icsve.org)
Offers field-driven research on radicalization, recruitment, and disillusionment within extremist groups, including white supremacists.
National Affairs (nationalaffairs.com)
Explores ideological shifts within American conservatism, including tensions between traditional conservatives and populist factions.
NBC News (nbcnews.com)
Investigative reporting on Proud Boys, Mom’s for Liberty, and other far-right groups involved in school board takeovers and political violence.
Newsweek (newsweek.com)
Covers the evolution of alt-right and alt-lite factions, including internal feuds, rebranding efforts, and public backlash.
Politico (politico.com)
Tracks conservative legislative strategy, infiltration of local government, and alliances between extremist groups and GOP hardliners.
Southern Poverty Law Center (splcenter.org)
Publishes the annual Year in Hate & Extremism report, documenting over 1,300 hate and antigovernment groups, their tactics, and political influence.
The Week (theweek.com)
Offers summaries and analysis of far-right rhetoric, cultural manipulation, and ideological laundering in mainstream discourse.
UAL Public Radio (ualpublicradio.org)
Regional reporting on extremist activity, especially in Southern and Midwestern states, including militia organizing and school board conflicts.
Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)
Used for foundational overviews of conservative movements, alt-right terminology, and bibliographic references.