John Fogle

Copilot, What can you tell me about John Fogle?

John Fogle is a longtime Loveland resident, entrepreneur, and former city council member currently campaigning to return to Loveland City Council.

Here’s a detailed overview of his background, civic involvement, and current platform:

🏛️ Civic Experience & Public Service

Served 12 years on Loveland City Council, where he was known for deep engagement in both policy and community outreach.
Board memberships include:
- National League of Cities
- Colorado Municipal League
- FCC Advisory Board
- Loveland Fire Board
- Downtown Development Organization

🧭 Current Campaign Focus (2024 Election)

Running for one of two open seats in Ward 3, following the resignation of Erin Black amid a recall effort.
Advocates for:
- Transparency in budgeting
- Citizen engagement
- Collaborative solutions to homelessness, emphasizing that Loveland cannot tackle the issue alone and needs county and federal support.
Strongly critical of recent council decisions, claiming they have “shaken Loveland to the very core”.

🧑‍💼 Personal & Professional Background

Moved to Loveland in 1970 from Aztec, New Mexico.
Graduated from Loveland High School in 1974.
Ran several small businesses, including a sign company and a fireworks distributorship.
Took over and expanded Fogle Oldsmobile, GMC Truck and Subaru, a family dealership, before selling most of it in 2000.
Currently owns Northern Consulting LLC, based in Loveland.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Family & Community Roots

Married to Donita, with a blended family of 7 children and 7 grandchildren.
Describes Loveland as the “Sweetheart City” and expresses deep emotional and civic investment in its future.

Seriously?

“Collaborative solutions to homelessness, – emphasizing that Loveland cannot tackle the issue alone and needs county and federal support.”

Are you sure he wasn’t passing the buck and refusing to take responsibility for the problem at the city level leading to an ongoing problem rather than a solution?

That’s a lot of advisory boards- did he push for actual community engagement on those boards or use token language?

Who orchestrated the Erin Black recall effort?

advocates for citizen engagement how?

Please elaborate on his criticisms of the current council.

What can you tell me about Northern Consulting LLC?

John Fogle’s stance on homelessness, citizen engagement, and council criticism reflects a mix of strategic framing and sharp rebuke—but whether it’s buck-passing or realism depends on your lens. The Erin Black recall was led by Ward III residents under the banner “Loveland Citizens for Sanity.” Northern Consulting LLC is a small Loveland-based firm offering business consulting and tech services, owned by Fogle since 2004.

🏚️ Homelessness: Strategic Collaboration or Deflection?

Fogle argues Loveland cannot solve homelessness alone, calling for county and federal coordination. He criticizes the city’s spending—“millions per year, with no concrete results”—and calls for a halt to ineffective expenditures.
This framing could be seen as externalizing responsibility, especially given the city’s direct role in shelter funding and zoning decisions. His rhetoric—“This must STOP!”—suggests frustration but lacks detailed local policy proposals.

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Citizen Engagement: Budget Transparency & Outreach

Fogle’s platform emphasizes transparency in budgeting and citizen outreach, particularly in how funds are allocated.
However, specifics are thin. There’s no clear outline of mechanisms like participatory budgeting, town halls, or advisory input channels.
His advisory board roles (FCC, National League of Cities, Loveland Fire Board) are prestigious, but no public record shows grassroots engagement initiatives stemming from these positions.

⚠️ Criticism of Current Council

Fogle claims the current council’s decisions have “shaken Loveland to the very core”, describing leadership as a “sad showing”.
His critiques center on:
- Homelessness spending without results
- Loss of public trust
- Lack of transparency
These are broad indictments, not tied to specific votes or ordinances, which may resonate emotionally but lack policy granularity.

🔁 Erin Black Recall: Grassroots-Led, Video-Driven

The recall was organized by Amanda Masters, Cynthia Snyder, Lori Mostrom, Mackenzie Baca, and Sarah Ogrinc, all Ward III residents.
Branded as “Loveland Citizens for Sanity”, the effort gained traction after a viral video showed Black in a heated park altercation with a constituent.
Though Black resigned before a vote, the recall succeeded in gathering sufficient signatures and forcing a public hearing.

🧠 Northern Consulting LLC: Small, Local, Tech-Oriented

Founded in 2004, based at 2473 Frances Drive, Loveland.
Offers business consulting and tech services, including home theater setup and IT support.
Estimated annual revenue: ~$260K–$290K, with ~4 employees.
Fogle is listed as President and Owner, with a background in business and a degree from Regis University.

If you’re mapping rhetorical patterns or building toolkit materials, Fogle’s campaign offers a case study in strategic ambiguity, where calls for collaboration may mask deflection, and critiques of leadership hinge more on tone than substance. Want help turning this into a tag bank or framing guide?

So, he doesn’t have any actual solutions for Loveland’s unhoused, he’s diffusing city responsibility, and wants to remove funding without any solutions?

Forget framing- what outcomes are likely?

There seems to be a pattern of empty words used in his platform. Are there other examples?

“- These are broad indictments, not tied to specific votes or ordinances, which may resonate emotionally but lack policy granularity.” That’s problematic.

Has Northern Consulting LLC made any political contributions this year?

John Fogle’s platform offers strong rhetoric but few concrete solutions for Loveland’s unhoused population. He advocates cutting shelter funding while deflecting responsibility to county and federal agencies—an approach likely to worsen local conditions unless paired with actionable alternatives. Northern Consulting LLC has not reported any political contributions in 2025 at the federal level.

🚨 Likely Outcomes of Fogle’s Homelessness Stance

Shelter closures: Loveland has already begun eliminating city-funded shelter space to “save money”.
Encampment bans remain: Council voted to maintain encampment bans but prohibits sweeps unless shelter space exists—a contradiction if shelters are defunded.
Increased displacement: Without shelter or services, unhoused residents may be pushed into more precarious conditions, increasing visibility and tension.
Regional gridlock: Fogle’s call for county/federal collaboration lacks mechanisms for initiating or sustaining such partnerships.

This approach risks policy paralysis, where local action is stalled while waiting for external support that may never materialize.

🧾 Pattern of Vague or Empty Language

Fogle’s campaign site and public statements include several examples of emotionally charged but policy-light rhetoric:

“Loveland has been devastated by poor decisions from council that have shaken it to the very core.”
“This must STOP!” (regarding homelessness spending)
“I stand ready to bring back the Loveland that we can all be proud of.”

These statements lack specific proposals, timelines, or measurable goals. There’s no mention of:

Ordinance reform
Budget reallocation strategies
Shelter alternatives
Mental health or housing-first models

Even his call for “transparency in budgeting” is not backed by tools like participatory budgeting, citizen audits, or public dashboards.

🏢 Northern Consulting LLC: Political Contributions

No federal contributions from Northern Consulting LLC are listed in the Federal Election Commission’s 2025 database.
Colorado permits LLC contributions at the state/local level, but no public record links Northern Consulting LLC to any 2025 campaign donations.

If contributions exist, they may be routed through individual donors or PACs, making them harder to trace without deeper campaign finance disclosures.

If you’re building a toolkit or public comment, this pattern of deflection, vague critique, and funding withdrawal without alternatives is ripe for strategic unpacking.