-
Relational Anthropology – Education
Chapter 17C discusses the shift from transactional to relational models in education through Relational Anthropology. It emphasizes that learning is a process of transformation built on relationships, trust, and internal narratives. This approach fosters coherent classrooms, resilient learners, and engaging educators, ultimately aligning education’s purpose beyond mere compliance to meaningful connection and understanding. Continue reading
Recent Posts
- AIQ- Lynching – A History
A History of Lynching in the United States - Relational Anthropology – Survivor Literacy
Survivor Literacy is an innate understanding developed through hardship, representing unspoken knowledge gained from trauma and resilience. It encompasses various forms of literacy, including endurance, care, and witnessing, emphasizing the importance of community. It reflects how survival informs wisdom, healing, and connection, ultimately fostering a collective ethos of support and remembrance. - 22) Mom
The narrative recounts the author’s complicated relationship with their mother following their father’s suicide. It depicts their mother’s struggles while raising her children amid grief, her strong personality, unique habits, and joys, such as cooking and gardening. Over time, her bitterness and distance grew, reflecting deep emotional turmoil. - Relational Anthropology – The Relational Lineage of Ethnic, Black, Indigenous, and Diaspora Thought
Chapter Thirty One highlights the critical contributions of Black, Indigenous, Chicano, feminist, queer, and diaspora thinkers to Relational Anthropology. These intellectuals reveal essential insights on power, identity, and survival, challenging traditional narratives and offering a foundation for survivor literacy. Their ideas shape our understanding of relational ethics and community resilience. - Relational Anthropology – Feminist, Queer, and Postcolonial Theory
Chapter Thirty emphasizes the influential thinkers in feminist, queer, and postcolonial theory who revitalized anthropology by restoring agency, embodiment, voice, and relational dynamics often overlooked in the discipline. It portrays these scholars as foundational figures who not only critiqued but also reconstructed anthropology’s moral architecture, creating a comprehensive relational lineage. - 84) Matthew
The post reflects on the impact of Matthew Shepard’s murder on the author, who feels deeply connected to their identity as a bisexual witch in Wyoming. It highlights the pervasive bigotry encountered, despite some community members claiming to support “live and let live.” The author expresses determination to fight for equality and honor Matthew’s legacy, feeling an obligation to remain visible and vocal against hatred. - Relational Anthropology – Archaeology
This chapter critiques archaeology for prioritizing its “heroes” over the human histories they uncover. By evaluating major theorists through a relational lens, it reveals the discipline’s biases towards order, systems, and grand narratives, while neglecting relationality, care, and the humanity of those whose lives are excavated. - Relational Anthropology – The Primatologists
Chapter Twenty-Eight, “The Primatologists,” explores the ethical and relational depth of primatology compared to anthropology. It evaluates key figures in the field, revealing that primatologists demonstrate more empathy and connection with their subjects. The chapter argues that relationality is essential for understanding and treating both primates and humans compassionately. - Relational Anthropology – The Bones We Inherited
This chapter examines the evolution of human origins research through a relational anthropological lens. It critiques historical figures in physical anthropology and paleoanthropology, categorizing them as friends, foes, or contributors to the field. Ultimately, it emphasizes that understanding human origins requires relational insight to combat the discipline’s foundation of hierarchy and scientific racism. - Relational Anthropology – A Relational Anthropologist’s Guide to Linguistic Theory
Chapter 26 examines the intersection of relationality and linguistic theory within linguistic anthropology. It categorizes key figures as foundational structuralists, ethnographers, and advocates of social issues, highlighting their contributions to understanding language as a social act. The Four F’s reveal insights about relational practice, illustrating the discipline’s commitment to lived experience and cultural context. - Relational Anthropology – Scholarship Profile- Dr. Pam Innes
Dr. Pamela J. Innes, Emeritus Associate Professor at the University of Wyoming, excels in Linguistic Anthropology with a focus on Native American languages and language revitalization. Renowned for her relational and community-focused approach, she is celebrated for her accessibility, knowledge, and commitment to student success, making a significant impact in Indigenous language practices. - Relational Anthropology -A Relational Anthropologist’s Guide to Navigating Cultural Theory
This chapter transforms the Four F’s—Friend, Foe, Food, Fornicate—into a relational tool for reading anthropological theory. It categorizes significant figures, revealing their relational dynamics, and emphasizes the discipline’s historical inclination toward relationality over control. Ultimately, it uncovers who nourished, inspired, or hindered anthropological exploration, highlighting potential for greater relational engagement. - Relational Anthropology – TechKnowledgy
In Chapter 24, the author explores the concept of “TechKnowledgy,” emphasizing that knowledge is relational rather than solitary. The chapter reveals how understanding emerges through interaction and dialogue, contrasting traditional learning methods with a more collaborative approach. This reframing leads to empowerment, allowing the author to embrace their cognitive style. - Relational Anthropology – Technology Gap
In Chapter 23, the author reflects on their struggle in graduate school, realizing it stemmed from a mismatch between their learning style and academic expectations. They emphasize a dialectical approach to knowledge, which thrives on engagement and interaction, rather than passive reading. This insight enabled them to embrace their unique cognitive process. - Relational Anthropology – Doula Discipline
Relational Anthropology is compared to a doula discipline, emphasizing accompaniment rather than extraction or observation in academia. Unlike traditional anthropology, it values presence, emotional literacy, and continuity over transactional methods. By fostering connections and recognizing that knowledge is relational, it highlights the importance of care in transformative processes.
Newsletter
One-Time
Monthly
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Choose an amount
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
Or enter a custom amount
$
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthly
Survivor Literacy 