Operation **Reclaim** Loveland

Charlie Kirk was a Great Big Jerk

Charlie Kirk was a Great Big Jerk

Charlie Kirk was a Great Big Jerk
And a great big jerk was he
He said that the deaths caused by guns on our streets
Are just the price of liberty

I wonder if he thought that he was immune?
Like it couldn’t happen if he was in the room…
That the lives being lost were disposable like mine,

And when WE die, they don’t think it’s a crime.


Never mind that the Second Amendment is this constitutional right
That is really a privilege in the function of being WHITE
Because, although my dad was a gunsmith, and I’ve been hands-on for a chunk of my life
I’ve never walked into a gun store and seen people of color welcomed inside.
When the hand that pulls the trigger is attached to a minority life
Suddenly, this sacred right becomes a crime
But when a privileged white boy shoots up a school it’s fine?

I do not understand how you could fail to see the line

When asked to account for mass shooting deaths,
He answered with conjecture, without regard for the lives wrecked
Without numbers or knowledge or a single fact
Blaming trans people, and minorities, when they’re already under attack.

I can’t help but notice you’re fine with that, but clutch your pearls when we fight back.

To hell with that.

Do you hear how they cheer? Do you hear how they clap?
I value the lives on the other side of that

The world is a little bit safer tonight
As one fewer bigot will hold a microphone and incite a riot
He behaved without regard for the damage he was doing
And there’s never accountability for the hate the right keeps spewing
Instead let’s blame the victims for being relieved at this removing.

Learn more about the Cult of the Ego

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

10 responses to “Charlie Kirk was a Great Big Jerk”

  1. Eric Foltin Avatar
    Eric Foltin

    You’re right about one thing: lives are not disposable. But let’s be clear—painting the Second Amendment as nothing more than a “white privilege pass” erases a whole lot of reality. The right to bear arms is not written for one race, one gender, or one social class. It’s enshrined for every citizen. Period. Do injustices happen? Absolutely. Does racism exist? Yes. But that doesn’t mean the Constitution itself is racist, or that responsible gun ownership is some kind of exclusive club.

    And this idea that only “privileged white boys” are excused while everyone else is punished? That’s a convenient narrative, but not a full truth. The justice system has flaws—sometimes massive ones—but plenty of white perpetrators have been locked up for life or put to death. Mass shooters of all backgrounds are vilified. Pretending otherwise is selective outrage.

    Blaming guns—or the race of the gun owner—distracts from the real issue: the person pulling the trigger. Evil doesn’t discriminate, and neither should accountability. Turning every shooting into a racial indictment instead of addressing the human choices behind it solves nothing.

    As for the claim that gun shops don’t welcome people of color—have you actually tested that across the board? Or are you projecting a feeling into a fact? In 2020 and beyond, minority gun ownership skyrocketed. Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans—all bought firearms in record numbers. Why? Because they knew the right was theirs, too. And they exercised it.

    What really jumps out, though, is the cheering for someone’s removal from a microphone—essentially celebrating censorship. That’s where the mask slips. If free speech only applies to views you like, it’s not free speech at all. The answer to bad speech is better speech—not silencing your opposition.

    So no—being relieved at “one fewer bigot” doesn’t make the world safer. It makes it smaller, weaker, less free. The real strength is standing up to bad ideas with better ones, not trying to erase voices you don’t want to hear.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply
    1. Protyus A. Gendher Avatar
      Protyus A. Gendher

      When the second amendment was written, black people only counted as 3/5 of a person for census purposes only. Women did not have any political presence as people afforded rights.

      This is gaslighting. Despite later amendments to MAKE the rest of us get to be people too, it has never actually reached that point.

      THAT’S the problem. We’re taught that we the people means ALL of the people, but legally and socially it never has.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      1. Eric Foltin Avatar
        Eric Foltin

        Oh sure, let’s toss the Second Amendment in the trash because society wasn’t perfect in 1789. While we’re at it, let’s cancel electricity too, since women couldn’t vote when Edison was tinkering with light bulbs. Clearly, the solution to history being messy is to pretend none of it counts.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Protyus A. Gendher Avatar
        Protyus A. Gendher

        Are you trying to see how many Logical Fallacies you can fit into one response,
        https://www.txst.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/false-dilemma.html
        https://www.txst.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/inconsistency.html
        https://www.txst.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/ought-is.html

        but most importantly https://www.txst.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/straw-person.html

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Eric Foltin Avatar
        Eric Foltin

        Funny thing about calling out fallacies—you can end up committing them yourself. Saying someone is “just seeing how many fallacies they can fit into one response” is a textbook false dilemma, because it pretends the only choices are “pure logic” or “all fallacy.” It edges into inconsistency, too, since the accuser insists on strict reasoning while loosely tossing labels without evidence. The “ought-is” sneaks in when they imply that because arguments ought to be perfectly logical, any flaw automatically proves bad faith. And ironically, shouting “straw person” without actually showing how the argument was distorted risks being a straw person in itself. In other words, the rebuttal falls into the same traps it’s trying to mock—proof that just dropping links to fallacy definitions isn’t the same as making a coherent case.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Belvesuscounselling Avatar
    Belvesuscounselling

    Whether you agree with what he stood for or not. It is not appropriate to write this sort of article. There is no justification for murder.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Protyus A. Gendher Avatar
      Protyus A. Gendher

      I absolutely and wholeheartedly disagree with you.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  3. Belvesuscounselling Avatar
    Belvesuscounselling

    Sadly that is exactly what is wrong with this world. I hope you refect on the fact you are enjoying the death of the father of two small children.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Protyus A. Gendher Avatar
      Protyus A. Gendher

      I’m not enjoying it. I’m properly contextualizing it. I hope you reflect on your defense of a bigot.

      Like

      Reply
      1. Eric Foltin Avatar
        Eric Foltin

        So it’s ok to kill a bigot?

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Protyus A. Gendher Cancel reply

Return to the Welcome Page

*If you find any pages that are hard to read or links that don’t work or really anything about the website please reach out to me. Protyusagendher@gmail.com

Providing free information and resources guides the spirit of this website. The only pay-only option on this site, is for posts that contain explicit content. If you like the content you see here, please consider giving a donation.

To make a BIGGER IMPACT, I strongly encourage you to send the content you see here to your friends and family. Talk about your opinions of the information here. Argue with me (about the content of course, not welcoming personal attacks- or engaging with those who can’t tell the difference).

Share the articles on social media. Leave a comment or a like.

Every little boost helps. The more you share, the more my audience grows. I know this is shocking, but I don’t have a lot of friends, so I hate to put this kind of pressure on you, but you’re kind of all I’ve got. If you share– we could build a community! (and I could get advertisers to foot the bill).

I’ve got BIG plans for a GENTLE TAKEOVER and I can’t do it without you!!